More on emissions trading - this time our comparison to the rest of the world
Tim Colebatch in today's Age newspaper rebuts the Rudd government's #1 justification for the 5% emissions target: our per capita cuts. He says it much better than I can, so read the article, but here are some extracts:
It's the Rudd Government's favourite line against critics of its 5 per cent target for emissions cuts: in per capita terms, we're doing more than Europe is. The PM, Penny Wong and Wayne Swan use it every time.
But there are two things wrong with it. The smaller error is that their numbers are wrong — all of them!...
If both [Australia and Europe] achieve their lower 2020 targets, we will still emit almost twice as much gas per head as Europeans: 16.1 tonnes compared with 8.8 tonnes.
And if we kept on at that rate, by 2050 our emissions per head would be 10.6 tonnes — back where Europe was in 2005.
It's our current per capita output that is the reason we need to make cuts larger than everyone else - it's certainly not a justification for making meagre cuts, especially as we started so much later than most other countries.